| Sacks | INTs | Fum Rec | Defensive TDs | Fantasy |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| {{fullPreSeasonProjection ? fullPreSeasonProjection.def_sack.toFixed(1) : '0'}} | {{fullPreSeasonProjection ? fullPreSeasonProjection.def_int.toFixed(1) : '0'}} | {{fullPreSeasonProjection ? fullPreSeasonProjection.def_fum_rec.toFixed(1) : '0'}} | {{fullPreSeasonProjection ? fullPreSeasonProjection.def_tds.toFixed(1) : '0'}} | {{fullPreSeasonProjection ? fullPreSeasonProjection[selectedScoringConfig.fantasyPtsKey].toFixed(1) : '0'}} |
Is Jauan Jennings the highest waiver wire priority after his huge Week 3? He's worth a look, but we have other options recommended higher for Week 4 waivers.
Read More »
Premium Content
Assuming we don't get a kneel fest, who belongs in your showdown lineups for this final game of the 2021 NFL regular season?
Read More »
Packers Add Nate Hobbs; Where Will He Play?
Packers Add Nate Hobbs; Where Will He Play?
The Packers have agreed to a four-year deal with CB Nate Hobbs. ESPN's Rob Demovsky reports that Hobbs will get "up to" $50 million with incentives and that $16 million comes as a signing bonus.
Patriots Pay Robert Spillane Lead-LB Money
Patriots Pay Robert Spillane Lead-LB Money
The Patriots have agreed to a three-year deal with LB Robert Spillane that will pay the former Raider more at least $10 million per year, according to ESPN's Jeremy Fowler. Spillane spent the past two years as a full-time starter for the Raiders, after working mostly as a backup and special-teamer through four seasons with Pittsburgh and one in Tennessee
Isaiah Pola-Mao Looks Set to Start Again
Isaiah Pola-Mao Looks Set to Start Again
The Raiders have announced a new deal with S Isaiah Pola-Mao. NFL Network's Ian Rapoport reports it's a to a two-year deal worth up to $8.45 million. That keeps Pola-Mao from becoming a restricted free agent in March.
| Week | Team | SOS | Fantasy | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1 |
|
LAC |
0% |
{{getWeeklyRankDisplayValue(scheduleWeeklyRanks[1], 1, 1)}} |
|
2 |
|
BAL |
0% |
{{getWeeklyRankDisplayValue(scheduleWeeklyRanks[2], 2, 1)}} |
|
3 |
|
@ CAR |
0% |
{{getWeeklyRankDisplayValue(scheduleWeeklyRanks[3], 3, 1)}} |
|
4 |
|
@ CLE |
0% |
{{getWeeklyRankDisplayValue(scheduleWeeklyRanks[4], 4, 1)}} |
|
5 |
|
DEN |
0% |
{{getWeeklyRankDisplayValue(scheduleWeeklyRanks[5], 5, 1)}} |
|
6 |
|
@ PIT |
0% |
{{getWeeklyRankDisplayValue(scheduleWeeklyRanks[6], 6, 1)}} |
|
7 |
|
LAR |
0% |
{{getWeeklyRankDisplayValue(scheduleWeeklyRanks[7], 7, 1)}} |
|
8 |
|
@ KC |
0% |
{{getWeeklyRankDisplayValue(scheduleWeeklyRanks[8], 8, 1)}} |
|
9 |
|
CIN |
0% |
{{getWeeklyRankDisplayValue(scheduleWeeklyRanks[9], 9, 1)}} |
|
10 |
BYE |
|||
|
11 |
|
MIA |
0% |
{{getWeeklyRankDisplayValue(scheduleWeeklyRanks[11], 11, 1)}} |
|
12 |
|
@ DEN |
0% |
{{getWeeklyRankDisplayValue(scheduleWeeklyRanks[12], 12, 1)}} |
|
13 |
|
KC |
0% |
{{getWeeklyRankDisplayValue(scheduleWeeklyRanks[13], 13, 1)}} |
|
14 |
|
TB |
0% |
{{getWeeklyRankDisplayValue(scheduleWeeklyRanks[14], 14, 1)}} |
|
15 |
|
@ ATL |
0% |
{{getWeeklyRankDisplayValue(scheduleWeeklyRanks[15], 15, 1)}} |
|
16 |
|
@ JAC |
0% |
{{getWeeklyRankDisplayValue(scheduleWeeklyRanks[16], 16, 1)}} |
|
17 |
|
NO |
0% |
{{getWeeklyRankDisplayValue(scheduleWeeklyRanks[17], 17, 1)}} |
|
18 |
|
@ LAC |
0% |
{{getWeeklyRankDisplayValue(scheduleWeeklyRanks[18], 18, 1)}} |
Search
Las Vegas Raiders's Preseason Player Analysis
Bottom Line